Lady Leak (ladyleak.com) is a leaked nudes site.
As of April 2023, the site ladyleak.com has 198.5k monthly views according to Similar Web. The Wayback Machine estimates that ladyleak.com was founded on March 16, 2021. The Internet Archive shows the domain ladyleak.com has been saved 49 times between March 16, 2021 and May 13, 2023.
Is ladyleak.com Safe?
I analyzed ladyleak.com for malware and malicious content to check if it was legit or a scam. Here are the results:
I checked ladyleak.com on Sucuri, and it returned as a medium security risk. Results: Sucuri scan for the site ladyleak.com.
Sucuri says ladyleak.com is a medium security risk because there is no redirect from HTTP to HTTPS found.
Security hardening flaws:
- Missing
Strict-Transport-Security
security header. Affected pages:
https://ladyleak.com/
The site ladyleak.com should also install a website firewall.
To check this further I ran a parasite scan with Unmask Parasites on ladyleak.com, and it is suspicious. Results: Unmask Parasites scan for the site ladyleak.com.
Unmask Parasites cites 1 suspicious inline script found:
eval(function(p,a,c,k,e,d){e=function(c){return c.toString(36)};if(!''.replace(/^/,String)){while(c--){d[c.toString(a)]=k...
I also checked ladyleak.com on VirusTotal, and it is clean. Results: VirusTotal scan for the site ladyleak.com.
Further, ladyleak.com is blocked by SCUMWARE on URLVoid. Results: URLVoid scan for ladyleak.com.
In conclusion, the site ladyleak.com is a medium security risk because it hasn’t set up a redirect for HTTPS. Unmask Parasites says the site ladyleak.com is suspicious because of 1 suspicious inline script found. VirusTotal and Sucuri the domain ladyleak.com has not been flagged as malicious. OVERALL GRADE: Relatively Safe.
Links and Profiles
Website: ladyleak.com
Mat Diekhake
May 19, 2023 @ 09:20
Note: I have chosen to report exactly what the Sucuri scan results show at the time of my scan. That said, when I browse the domain ladyleak.com, my Google Chrome browser shows that it is using a secure HTTPS connection. It is possible the Sucuri scan has detected something not available to my eye which is why I will show its results, though it is possible the scan has missed the fact that it may already be using HTTPS. I will rescan this site in the future and update the results accordingly, always based on what the scan results shows.